首页> 外文OA文献 >We adapt … but is it good or bad? : Locating the political ecology and social-ecological systems debate in reindeer herding in the Swedish Sub-Arctic
【2h】

We adapt … but is it good or bad? : Locating the political ecology and social-ecological systems debate in reindeer herding in the Swedish Sub-Arctic

机译:我们适应了……但是好还是坏? :在瑞典亚北极地区寻找驯鹿放牧的政治生态学和社会生态系统辩论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Reindeer herding (RDH) is a livelihood strategy deeply connected to Sami cultural tradition. This article explores the implications of two theoretical and methodological approaches for grasping complex socioenvironmental relationships of RDH in Subarctic Sweden. Based on joint fieldwork, two teams – one that aligns itself with political ecology (PE) and the other with social-ecological systems (SES) – compared PE and SES approaches of understanding RDH. Our purpose was twofold: 1) to describe the situation of Sami RDH through the lenses of PE and SES, exploring how the two approaches interpret the same empirical data; 2) to present an analytical comparison of the ontological and epistemological assumptions of this work, also inferring different courses of action to instigate change for the sustainability of RDH. Key informants from four sameby in the Kiruna region expressed strong support for the continuation of RDH as a cultural andeconomic practice. Concerns about the current situation raised by Sami representatives centered on the cumulative negative impacts on RDH from mining, forestry and tourism. PE and SES researchers offered dissimilar interpretations of the key aspects of the RDH socio-economic situation, namely: the nature and scale of RDH systems; the ubiquitous role of conflict; and conceptualizations of responses to changing socioenvironmental conditions. Due to these disparities, PE and SES analyses have radically divergent sociopolitical implications for what ought to be done to redress the current RDH situation
机译:驯鹿放牧(RDH)是一种与萨米族文化传统息息相关的谋生策略。本文探讨了两种理论和方法论方法对于把握瑞典亚北极地区RDH复杂的社会环境关系的意义。在联合野外工作的基础上,两个团队(一个与政治生态学(PE)保持一致,另一个与社会生态系统(SES)相适应)比较了PE和SES理解RDH的方法。我们的目的是双重的:1)通过PE和SES的视角描述萨米族RDH的情况,探索两种方法如何解释相同的经验数据; 2)进行这项工作的本体论和认识论假设的分析比较,还可以推断出不同的行动方式来促进RDH可持续性的变化。来自基律纳地区四个萨伊比的主要线人表示坚决支持继续将RDH作为一种文化和经济实践。萨米族人代表对当前局势的关注集中在采矿,林业和旅游业对RDH的累积负面影响上。 PE和SES研究人员对RDH社会经济状况的关键方面提供了不同的解释,即:RDH系统的性质和规模;冲突的普遍作用;以及应对不断变化的社会环境条件的构想。由于存在这些差异,PE和SES分析对于应解决当前RDH情况应采取的措施具有截然不同的社会政治影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号